Switching locale (Gnome 3, Fedora 20) and making sure all the menus switch too

In the spirit of immersion, I switched the laptop's language to Japanese, however most of the Gnome menus remained in English even after switching the System Language altogether, logging out etc. Another profile on the laptop shows the menus for Activities, etc in Japanese just fine so it wasn't a missing package. I found the following in ~/.profile, which seems a bit heavy-handed but does do the trick. For future reference:

LANG="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LANGUAGE="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_CTYPE="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="ja_JP.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=

Note on restarting X one is asked if they want to change the names for the default folders like Documents, etc. Personally I find it makes using the CLI a pain and don't recommend it.

Leave a comment

FOSDEM 2015

FOSDEM logo

Last week-end I attended FOSDEM for the 7th time. It's kinda strange to say and think - if someone tells me they've been going to this or that open-source conference for 7 years I tend to assume they're hardcore and totally know what they're doing. I go to hang out with cool folks and learn new things. This year's FOSDEM didn't disappoint in that regard!

As usual, the conference was packed and most rooms filled up quickly, but I was happily surprised to see it was still possible to squeeze in some of the more popular rooms regardless. I think many devrooms organisers are well aware of the frustration with not being able to get in and they did a great job at encouraging/demanding folks use all seats rather than leave spaces in the middle, which really helped (special kudos to the Legal devroom, which was in a smaller room in H). Also the main conference organisers appear quite good at trying to adjust the room size based on popularity year to year (e.g. the Mozilla room used to be utterly impossible to get into).

Some of the conference highlights from my perspective:

Identity Crisis: Are we who we say we are?

This was the first keynote on Saturday morning, which I think did a good job of bringing up many possible ambiguities hidden in the "we" we use when contributing to a project. One of the strengths of open-source is that we're quick to say "we" and include everyone, but sometimes it bears more thinking or clarification of who we actually mean with "we" - sometimes two "we" can describe different subgroups of contributors even in the same sentence. Taking the time to think explicitly about who we mean, and avoid unintended conflicts of interests is important.

Link

Fog of War - The GNOME Trademark Battle

The story of what was happening in the background during the Gnome battle for their trademark with Groupon last year, told by a Gnome board member and the lawyer that helped them on the case. Interesting insights thanks to the lawyer's perspective particularly, who also took a guess at what possibly happened in the Groupon lawyers' mind during their risk analysis and the consequences (e.g. "Groupon was dealing with an animal they'd never seen before." A charitable org not willing to be silenced or take a big donation.) Not a kind reflection on Groupon.

Link

Why Samba moved to GPLv3: Why we moved, what we gained, what we lost.

Emboldened by having managed to get a seat in the Legal devroom, I decided to also stick around for the next talk. I hadn't attended a talk on GPLv3 in a few years and I wasn't to be disappointed. It was a very honest and funny talk - I knew of Jeremy Allison aka the Samba guy, but I didn't know he was such an entertaining speaker. Overall Samba seems very happy with the move to GPLv3, it simplified a lot of things for them especially in terms of copyright managenent (some companies are just nasty), and most of the contributors and users they initially lost ended up returning (multiple closed-source vendors being bought out and leaving their customers in the cold likely helped). They felt really let down that the FSF didn't force their own projects to move as well (though I understand that is not the case anymore) and of course the Linux kernel being GPLv2-only is hurtful too. The speaker is convinced that all the scary stuff around GPLv3 is FUD and everyone should switch to using GPLv3+ right now if they don't have to link to v2 stuff. An audience member did raise an issue/unclear point with the v3 licence, for when a company rents a device to a customer (that the user doesn't actually own and thus perhaps? shouldn't be allowed to modify).

Link

Participation metrics at Mozilla: A story of systems and data

For projects that depend so heavily on volunteer contributions as Mozilla does, understanding who the community is made of and where/when people are being lost or leave is really important. The speaker started by showing us some of the ways they tried and failed to measure participation and what they ended up with. They defined what "participation" means by formalising paths a contributor might take across their systems (e.g. file a bug, comment on a bug, translate a string, etc) and they extract and map the data they have to these paths. This enables them to also deduplicate contributor information: for instance it's not because you have 100 translators and 300 developers that you have 400 contributors, people can do more than one thing, and it also lets them identify more clearly whether someone is leaving the project altogether or simply moving to another area. Very interesting stuff!

This is work in progress but their current results and reports are available at Are we a million yet.

Link

Maintaining & growing a technical community: Mozilla Developer Network

The other Mozilla talk I attended explored the meaning of community and the motivations behind why people start contributing, why they continue to contribute and how to help folks feel involved and want to contribute. The speaker made some really good points, one that really stuck with me being that contributors ≠ community. It's really important to connect contributors to your community or they will not stick around! The example she used was getting people to contribute at hackathons-like events, but then disappear - as someone who's run such events that certainly rang true, simply showing folks they can make a positive impact easily is not enough to make them come back or feel part of the community.

Link

Retooling Fedora: A Retrospective on Fedora 21 (and looking to 22)

I knew Fedora had been changing their model since the past release but I hadn't been following closely. This clarified the goals and the why, and I was very impressed with the beginning of the talk where the speaker (Matthew Miller, the current Fedora Project Leader) took a really hard look at where distributions are today and why they appear to be becoming less relevant - for instance looking at the contrast between the number of open-source projects available on platforms like Github compared to what is actually packaged in the distro. People used to care about getting their software into the major distributions but it doesn't seem to matter as much nowadays. In that light the "ring" graph showed toward the end, explaining that perhaps the apps at the outer layer don't need as strict and stringent criterias for inclusion than the more core OS components, totally makes sense and the future looks interesting.

Link

¤

I continue to be hugely impressed by how much Mozilla cares about improving the experience for new and existing contributors (impressed but not surprised! Their "Get Involved" page remains excellent, letting you get in touch with real people while showing at one glance all the different ways you can help, and having a mentored bugs process for new contributors is an awesome step-up from simply tagging easy bugs. Keep rocking and showing us all how it's done Mozilla!)

Videos of the talks should be available in time on the FOSDEM website.

Leave a comment

Training at EuroPython 2014 Making your first contribution to OpenStack

OpenStack logo

Last week I ran a 3-hour training on how to get started contributing to OpenStack at EuroPython. The aim was to give a high-level overview of how the contribution process works in the project and guide people through making their first contribution, from account creation to submitting a patch.

Overview

The session starts with an extremely fast overview of OpenStack, geared toward giving the participants an idea of the different components and possible areas for contribution. We then go through creating the accounts, why they're all needed, and how to work with DevStack for the people who have installed it. From there we finally start talking about the contribution process itself, some general points on open-source and OpenStack culture then go through a number of ideas for small tasks suitable for a first contribution. After that it's down to the participants to work on something and prepare a patch. Some people chose to file and triage/confirm bugs. The last part is about making sure the patch matches the community standards, submitting it, and talking about what happens next both to the patch and to the participant as a new member of the community.

Preparing

During the weeks preceding the event, I ran two pilot workshops with small groups (less than 10 people) in my local hackerspace, in preparation for the big one in Berlin. That was absolutely invaluable in terms of making the material more understandable and refining the content for items I didn't think of covering initially (e.g. screen, openrc files) and topics that could use more in-depth explanations (e.g. how to find your first task), timings, and generally getting a feel for what's reasonably achievable within a 3-hour intro workshop.

Delivering

I think it went well, despite some issues at the beginning due to lack of Internet connectivity (always a problem during hands-on workshops!). About 70 people had signed up to attend (a.k.a. about 7 times too many), thankfully other members of the OpenStack community stepped up and offered their help as mentors - thanks again everyone! In the end, about half the participants showed up in the morning, and we lost another dozen to the Internet woes. The people who stayed were mostly enthusiastic and seemed happy with the experience. According to the session etherpad, at least 5 new contributors uploaded a first patch :) Three are merged so far.

Distributing the slides early proved popular and useful. For an interactive workshop with lots of links and references it's really helpful for people to go back on something they missed or want to check again.

Issues

The start of the workshop is a bit lecture-heavy and could be titled "Things I Desperately Wish I Knew When Starting Out," and although there's some quizzes/discussions/demoing I'd love to make it more interactive in the future.

The information requested in order to join the Foundation tends to surprise people, I think because people come at it from the perspective of "I want to submit a patch" rather than "I am preparing to join a Foundation." At the hackerspace sessions in particular (maybe because it was easier to have candid discussions in such a small group), people weren't impressed with being forced to state an affiliation. The lack of obvious answer for volunteers gave the impression that the project cares more about contributions from companies. "Tog" might make an appearance in the company stats in the future :-)

On the sign-up form, the "Statement of Interest" is intimidating and confusing for some people (I certainly remember being uncertain over mine and what was appropriate, back when I was new and joining the Foundation was optional!). I worked around this after the initial session by offering suggestions/tips for both these fields, and spoke a bit more about their purpose.

A few people suggested I simply tell people to sign up for all these accounts in advance so there's more time during the workshop to work on the contribution itself. It's an option, though a number of people still hit non-obvious issues with Gerrit that are difficult to debug (some we opened bugs for, others we added to the etherpad). During one of the pilot sessions at the hackerspace, 6 of the 7 participants had errors when running git review -s  - I'm still not sure why, as it Worked On My Machine (tm) just fine at the same time.


Overall, I'm glad I did this! It was interesting to extract all this information from my brain, wiki pages and docs and attempt to make it as consumable as possible. It's really exciting when people come back later to say they've made a contribution and that the session helped to make the process less scary and more comprehensible. Thanks to all the participants who took the time to offer feedback as well! I hope I can continue to improve on this.

Leave a comment

Testing in Horizon Unit testing for the Openstack Dashboard

Belatedly, here are the notes for the design session/tutorial I gave about testing in Horizon at the OpenStack Summit in Portland, back in April. The etherpad is available over there. Session description:

The main aspect: the Horizon unit tests can be quite complex for new contributors and people extending Horizon to wrap their head around. Mocking with mox, the django unit testing framework,the openstack specific parts of the testing framework, selenium, fixtures/test data handling, qunit...This session could work as a tutorial/tips and tricks on the different testing components. Common errors being thrown and how to debug them. If people could bring up their pain points, that would also be useful.

If there is time, it would be interesting to also address the issue from another angle and think on how to improve what we have, particularly on the Selenium front which has been quite unstable.

General structure

There are 3 main parts to Horizon testing (4 if you include the bits that come from the Python unit testing framework, but we won't get into it here. If you've done unit testing before, it's the usual set of assertions and scaffolding that come with any unit testing framework).

As an example to map to what this is all talking about, I recommend keeping InstancesTest.test_index in the background.

Django unit testing

Docs: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/topics/testing/

At the moment Horizon is compatible with 1.4 onwards. The django documentation is excellent and I recommend having a look. Thanks to django we get a lot of goodies for free to help with testing a web application. Among other things:

  • A test client, which mimics a very simple browser (no Javascript) to do GET and POST requests, and built-in tooling to have interesting interactions with the responses.
  • A bunch of additional assertions, to check the HTML, templates, etc., all documented in the link above.

If you're familiar with django already, or while you're reading the django docs, there are a couple of things to watch out for:

  • Horizon does not use models.py, and does not have a database
  • Horizon doesn't use fixtures either (actually it does, but they're very different since they're not done the django way - cf. no models)

Horizon unit testing

Docs: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/horizon/topics/testing.html

Helper classes: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/d4b0ab4aa395bf4df2964efcc358100117efdaa0/horizon/test/helpers.py#L65

There are some docs for testing in Horizon, which contain useful advice for writing good tests in general. A few sections only are specific to Horizon:

Now let's have a look at helpers.py, where the TestCase classes we extend in Horizon tests are defined.

The setUp() and tearDown() methods do the housekeeping for mox/mocking so that we don't have to worry about it when writing tests. The aforementioned Horizon-specific assertions are also defined in this class. It extends the django TestCase class thus all of the django unit test goodness is available.

In general, this class is the best documentation available of what happens in the tests and how they are set up.

Openstack Dashboard unit testing

APIs: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/tree/d4b0ab4aa395bf4df2964efcc358100117efdaa0/openstack_dashboard/api

Test data: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/tree/d4b0ab4aa395bf4df2964efcc358100117efdaa0/openstack_dashboard/test/test_data

Helper classes: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/d4b0ab4aa395bf4df2964efcc358100117efdaa0/openstack_dashboard/test/helpers.py#L98

The Horizon tips and tricks mentioned earlier also apply, but there are no specific documentation page about the topic.

A quick overview of openstack_dashboard/ and the sections that matter to us in the context of unit testing:

  • APIs

The API directory is the only place that talks directly with the outside world, that is, the various openstack clients. This is why Horizon doesn't have a database, because it doesn't store any data itself.

  • Test Data

The test data is also stored in a single directory, and contains the fixtures, that are used to represent (mock) the data returned by the different clients.

  • Helper classes

Like in the "framework" part of Horizon, a helpers.py file defines the TestCases we extend later in the unit tests. This is where a lot of the magic happens: the TestCase extends the Horizon TestCase helper class described earlier, loads the test data, sets up mox, creates a fake user to log in. There's also a couple of useful assertions defined that are used all over the place.

There are other TestCase classes in there, for tests that may require an Admin user, testing the APIs, or Selenium.

A quick look at the example

The flavours returned by self.flavors.list() come from the test data.

We'll look at the mocking stuff in the Tools section. The APIs being mocked all live in the API directory, so this is the only place that needs to be mocked.

self.client() is the default django client, reverse() and assertTemplateUsed() also come from django.

self.assertItemsEquals() is a Python assertion.

Tools

Mox

In Horizon, mocks are used a lot, everywhere or otherwise running the unit tests would require a fully set up, running Openstack environment.

I found mox a bit difficult to get used to. There's a specific terminology, that translates to a different set of steps than is common in other mocking tools like mock.

First you record. That's the part in the tests where you create the stubs (in a decorator in the example) and "record" what you expect will happen (that's the place in the example that says: "when api.nova.flavour_list() is called with these exact arguments as described, return self.flavors.list()").

Then you replay, with self.mox.ReplayAll() which will make sure the rest of the test will get the data it expects, that you just mocked.

Finally, the reverify step is done in the parent TestCase class' tearDown() function, which calls self.mox.VerifyAll() and ensures the functions recorded were all called, and in the order defined.

There are lots of catches in mox, it's quite strict. Order matters. By default it assumes the mocked function will only be called once and fails otherwise (that's a big one that can be difficult to track down). MultipleTimes() will save you if a function needs to be called more than a couple of times.

Stubbing can be done via a decorator (which is the favoured way going forward) or a StubOutWithMox function, which can still be found in places.

Mox errors can be confusing and I recommend reading the Horizon docs about understanding mox output, which have a couple of paragraphs explaining different errors that may be encountered, the dreaded Expected and Unexpected calls.

Selenium

Helper classes: https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/d4b0ab4aa395bf4df2964efcc358100117efdaa0/openstack_dashboard/test/helpers.py#L326

We use Selenium for testing Javascript interactions. It's a bit heavyweight since it requires starting a browser, so Python unit tests are preferred when possible.

It's more stable now (thanks Kieran), so hopefully we can write a few more tests for the places where it's needed.

qUnit (briefly)

qUnit is used for some of the pure Javascript tests.

It's not used a lot in Horizon. The handmade fixtures take a lot of effort to make so maybe it's better to use Selenium in most cases.

Tips and tricks

  • See the Tips and tricks from the Horizon testing topic
  • Use pdb to check the environment status
  • Anything else? From the session:
    • Mock everything, and if it doesn't work mock it again.
    • Selenium tests: having a flag to turn off/on mocking? So we can run them as integration tests when needed and make sure we still match the correct APIs - cf. blueprint
    • Using Selenium tests as integration tests: build more tests (start a VM, ssh into it)

Discussion

Unfortunately, the day was running late (and I was speaking at the very next session) therefore the discussion part didn't have time to happen.

I'm disappointed about that and would welcome people discussing their experience and pain points, particular from a newcomer's perspective.

Fortunately when it comes to discussing the Selenium issues, Kieran Spear had successfully fixed it right before the Summit :)

Leave a comment

Evolving Open-Source Night Open-Source Night - June

The monthly Open-Source night experiment continues. On Wednesday, June 19th we had the June edition of Open-Source Night. Rory gave us a slightly-longer-than-15-minutes talk on OpenStreetMap, and the kind of contributions the project welcomes (data data data, really!). I was the only one to volunteer for a lightning talk, in stark contrast with the last event where we had multiple ones both by people attending open-source night and network people who happened to be visiting the hackerspace at the time.

Rather than doing an on-topic talk about an open-source project, I did a meta-talk about Open-Source Night itself and different ways in which it could evolve.

I make no secret that I don't think open-source night works very well in its current format. My goal (and measure for success) is to help people actually get started contributing.

Note: if you were at my deep dive on contributing to open-source and planning on attending the next open-source night, please do come!! This all just means that I think there are things that can be improved :)

Reminder: The current format

We're currently meeting on the 3rd Wednesday of the month. The event usually starts with two 15 minutes talk, ideally one on the life of open-source (e.g. licences, version control, IRC, using the command-line...) and one on how to contribute to a specific project. Then there's a number of 5-minutes-long-or-less lightning talks where people can introduce the project they will be working on during the evening. Then people break into groups or independently work on an open-source project of their choice.

Or that's the idea anyway. The talks usually work well and are inspiring, though they tend to run overtime and then people have trouble sitting at a table and doing things.

The future

These are my thoughts and ideas as to where open-source night might go in the future. These are not plans. I would like to hear feedback from interested people - attendees, would-be attendees, other organisers and thoughtful passerbys.

Topics: General open-source vs Project-specific

I see value in both topics, but perhaps attendees and would-be attendees favour one or the other, both, or neither? I haven't really heard much on this, what people find most useful. I think the project specific talks at least are interesting for both newcomers and established contributors, to see how other projects do things.

I believe 15 minutes is a good amount of time to get an overview, get inspired and get ideas. And not get too bored if already familiar with the topic.

I could see the value and how efficient it would be to focus on one project for a full session and guide people through contributing to it. However I can also see how it could be offputting to people not particularly interested in the project (e.g. "I don't use that distro, why should I bother attending?"). Perhaps as separate, off-shoot events if people are interested in leading that kind of session (get in touch!).

Topics: All kind of contributions vs Focusing on code

At the moment, I try really hard to emphasise (and encourage speakers to do the same) all the kinds of contributions that can be made - and are well needed! - even though my own experience lies in code-based contributions. Maybe I should give up on being inclusive and focus on what I know best, rather than try to be all things to all people? Code-focused open-source events could go from learning to program to fixing a bug.

Initially I was hoping people would step up to talk and encourage people to join their area of interest (I think we have e.g. experienced open-source translators around...) but that hasn't happened.

This is actually a point where someone came up to me after the talk and said straight off they really liked the breadth of contributions demoed during the talks, in particular mentioning last month's talk by Guilherme on OpenMandriva that did a great job showing how someone can help, in a multitude of ways, even if they're not all that confident in their coding skills.

Format: More course-like?

A couple of days before the June OSS Night I was pointed to this article on a really, really interesting summer course on learning to program the open-source way. That's a really cool concept. Should we entertain the thought of doing something similar during open-source night? e.g. A session on learning how to use version control with exercises, very workshop like, one month, some other topic the next one, etc.?

Probably not, but something to consider as a separate course with a shorter timeline. A course with one session a month will lose people and have little momentum. Is this the kind of things people have an interest in learning?

Format: Doing vs Listening/Talking

My goal with this event is still to get people started contributing. I'm not interested in organising a monthly night of talks. Finding speakers is stressful. If the talks aren't followed by some contributing action, to me the event is failing and I'm not interested in continuing to organise it. There are plenty of events around Dublin already where people can meet, talk tech and shoot the breeze.

With regard to open-source related talks, I think that's already handled well by the ILUG folks, who are now keen to set them up regularly again under the new chairmanship :) And we can join forces if that's the most attractive part of the event to folks. If your main interest is in having a regular night of open-source talks, get in touch and I'll be happy to help you have this in Tog. I'd attend with pleasure anyway, I'm just not interested in organising it and go speaker-hunting every 3 weeks.

I still believe we can make something really cool happen by putting in the same room people experienced in open-source together with newcomers interested in contributing. So I'm not giving up yet!

There's of course also the timeframe issue: with or without talks, an evening of maybe 3 hours is not a lot of time to accomplish something. Maybe we could (also/instead?) have events on Saturdays? And/or week-end workshops, Friday eve to Sunday?

HOWEVER, in any case an evening is still enough time to accomplish something, get started, get the momentum going, get unblocked and finish your contribution later at the week-end, in your own time.

You: Why are you here anyway*? ;)

* Or why weren't you? :) I'm just as interested in the answer to that!

Are you interested in learning how to contribute? Interested in helping and mentoring newcomers? What were you hoping this evening would be about?

I then invited people to have a productive discussion with me about this should they wish to, somewhat contradicting my own doing vs talking rant :-)

Please feel free and welcome to continue the discussion in the comments or by email, I would love to pick more brains and exchange ideas about this.

Django challenge

To avoid the talk being entirely meta (and in case people didn't care that much about all the blah blah blah and more about the doing!), I issued a challenge to attendees as well: this evening, run the Django unit tests suite. If that's something you're set up for, it'll take 2 minutes. If you're familiar with the concept but don't have all the dependencies set up yet it'll take 20 minutes. If this is all new to you it might take 2 hours, but what you learn you'll be able to reuse when you start working on a project you care about in the future, and it means it'll take less long then.

One person took me up on it and it took them 10 minutes. This shows how possible it is to actually get the ball rolling during open-source night, get people to realise they're not that far away from a first contribution.

I feel I should give the disclaimer that since the last time I talked about how to contribute to Django, the Django folks added to their docs a tutorial on how to make your first contribution, which just makes the project that little bit more awesome (and this challenge, easier to solve!)

Next Open-Source Night: July

So next month. That'll be on the 17th of July. Are you interested in giving a talk? :)

If no one volunteers we'll have a session similar to the first event except with more lightning talks. Lightning talks don't have to be prepared, there's no need for slides or anything you don't fancy. It's as simple as chatting about what you plan on doing or would like to do during the evening, inviting others to join you if they'd like.

It can be like:

"Hello, I'm Chris, a contributor to AwesomeProject which is a project that does this and that and also that thing. At the moment we're looking for help in $area1, $area2, $area41, if you think that's cool and you'd like to help, I'll be sitting at that table over here, come and chat with me. Maybe I can help you find a good first task. Otherwise I'll be working on the defroglirnator for the project -- er if you have any experience in that area I'd love to chat to you too."

or maybe

"Hey, I'm J. Bloggs, I've been using Wordpress for a few years, I think it's an awesome project and I'd like to start giving back. Tonight my plan is to figure out the new contributor process - if you're interested too, we can do this together. Come and chat with me."

It doesn't matter if there is no existing contributor to the specific project in the room. Since there are people familiar with the way open-source projects and communities usually tick, they will be able to help you if you get stuck.


Ok, that's it! I'm hoping to also have the time to find a few good first tasks in a new project, maybe LibreOffice. If not, then we can figure it out together on the day :)

I'm very much looking forward to hearing your thoughts, suggestions and ideas about all this, and perhaps also see you on the 17th.

Leave a comment | 2 so far

Open-Source Night #2: March 2013

On Wednesday the 20th, we had the 2nd edition of Open-Source Night in Tog. I think it went well. Once again there was about a dozen attendees, many of whom have never contributed to open-source before. A third of them were also in Tog for the first time. It might be too early to matter but there was also very little overlap with the audience from last time.

Talks

We started the evening with 2 talks, meant to be about 15 minutes long each. Mark started the evening telling us about open-source licences and the philosophy they encapsulate/were born from. Then I walked through how one would go about contributing to Django, basically clicking through the Django website and explaining different tasks the project needs help with, particularly for bug fixing contributions.

After this, we had 2 lightning talks that were meant to last 2 to 5 minutes, to give people a chance to talk about a project they contribute to and get people to join in. This time the talks were more about ideas, which is fine, but both also ran overtime, which is less cool. I'm not sure if either found additional contributors/would-be contributors out of it for the evening.

Hands-on

The second part of the evening, the part that should be hands-on, didn't go so well. After the talks (which lasted for 1h30 instead of 45mins) and a tour of the hackerspace for the new people, most continued chatting instead of sitting down and getting things done. This especially saddened me for the ones who had never contributed before. The goal of the event is to help newcomers get started contributing, when they have experienced people at hand to ask questions to.

Next time

I'm not sure how to improve this next time and help attendees get started actually doing stuff. Running overtime for the talks really hurt for the rest of the evening, which is already such a short time to accomplish something. An idea: after my talk I was asked "How long would it take for someone to start from nothing to being able to run the Django unit test suite?" and maybe this kind of well-defined, self-contained task would be good to help people get started. It's not a contribution yet, but it's a first, necessary step toward it (for code contributions in any case), and it could be fun to try and mix this with some sort of open badge.

Somewhat related announcement: open-source night won't happen on April 17th next month but probably on April 24th instead. Check the tog.ie calendar for confirmation. If you're interested in speaking on a topic relating to the life of open-source or a project in particular, please get in touch :)

Leave a comment

Open-Source Night: Event #1 February 20th

On Wednesday, Tog hosted the first monthly Open-Source Night.

It's an event I'd been wanting to organise for a while, with an eye on it being hands-on and slanted toward helping interested people get started in open-source, but I wasn't sure what format would work best. I'm still not sure, but in the spirit of release early, release often, I thought I'd give it a shot for a few months and iterate.

For the first event, about a dozen people showed up. About 7-9 of them had already made some kind of contribution, most people had a clear idea of the project they wanted to contribute to for the evening, and 3 were hesitant and not sure what they wanted to do.

Blackboard with project names

We started with 2 super short talks, an ill-prepared one from myself about what to do tonight: basically find the contributor's guidelines for the project you're interested in and speak to the person next to you for help, since we had such a skewed ratio of experienced contributors. Triona followed with a talk on what she planned to do in the evening with Free Penguin, an open-source sewing pattern for Tux plushes. The maintainer hasn't updated nor responded to emails in years, so it seems it will need to be forked in order to start improving the documentation. Open-source projects aren't all about code! :)

I directed the hesitant project-less people toward Cheryl and the Dreamwidth project, which has an excellent reputation for being friendly to newcomers. Even without an experienced contributor around, I thought figuring things out together would be a fun learning experience. It may not have been that effective though, people were interested and looked around but nothing got accomplished (perhaps that is to be expected for a first couple of hours getting acquainted with a project and open-source?). Then further efforts were thwarted by technical problems (bugzilla down). Cheryl's thoughts abut this is that it's difficult to get into a project one doesn't feel strongly about (a similar downside applies to projects discovered via OpenHatch, as someone else mentioned to me).

There were a couple of serendipitous meetings, like the person wanting to get started with Debian packaging who happened to be sitting besides a Debian Developer.

But overall, I think having encouraged people to come along already having a project in mind made it difficult to form groups and encourage collaboration, because people ended up working on the project they had planned to alone. It may not have been a great experience, particularly for people who didn't know anyone or hadn't been in Tog before.

I also need to become more familiar with projects who have good, specific non-programming-related tasks for newcomers. I had a general idea but wasted time trying to find the details. We had a graphic designer interested in either contributing his design skills, translating or participating in testing efforts but I wasn't able to quickly find a good "Here's a concrete task you can do now" for some of the better known projects. He did discover InkScape and became eager to learn it, so I hope to see him again in Tog in a few weeks for teaching an intro workshop to InkScape :-) (Thanks Borud!!)

Ideas on how to evolve the format for next time:

Choose one project and make it the main focus of the evening, at least at the start. Meaning only one presentation, that is a bit longer (ideally 20 minutes, max 30 -- we still need time to actually do stuff!) and give specific, step-by-step instructions on "this is where you go to find something to work on, this is how you choose a task" and afterwards have the people interested in working on the project do so together - several people to one task can work, to encourage learning together and avoid getting stuck. People are still welcome to work on whatever else they want to of course. This was suggested by Ulrich based on the recent Debian Bug Squashing Parties he attended.

Becky said there was an interest in a GitHub pair programming type of exercise. People upload code on GitHub they never touch again. Working on someone else's code with the help of the author could turn into an instructive experience. It would also be cool to see what a pull request looks like from both sides.

I think we can try both these things for next time, the GitHub pair programming could start after the presentation for people not interested in working on the highlighted project.

Now. The next step is to find a project to highlight and a willing contributor who'd like to present and guide, for the next session on March 20th. Ideas, volunteers? :)

Feedback and general thoughts on evolving the format are warmly welcome as well.

Leave a comment

Interested in open-source? Come to Tog!

Are you an experienced open-source contributor interested in recruiting new people for your project?

Are you a fan of open-source who would be interested in contributing at any level but isn't sure how to?

Come to Tog's first Open-Source Night on February 20th!

These hands-on sessions aim to bring together experienced open-source contributors with people who would like to get started but aren’t sure where to start or would generally benefit from having someone to ask questions to.
[...]
Every month we will start with a couple of people speaking for 5-10 minutes, to introduce the project they are working on, what is the usual path for contributing and where they are currently looking for help. Then we will form groups and work on making a contribution for the rest of the evening.


I'm hoping to make this into a regular monthly event. The current plan is to try it for a few months and see what it becomes. This will heavily depends on who attends so, help me recruit lots of interested people from both side of the contributor spectrum in Dublin :)

Leave a comment

Friendliness in open-source

The general view of open-source communities when standing at the edges is probably a vision of endless flames, strong personalities clashing, patches being ripped to shreds on mailing-lists, RTFMs, and the general need to have a thick skin when going in there or being crushed to pieces. The high-profile projects where one might think to contribute first like the Linux Kernel can have quite an intimidating culture, keeping lurkers looking out from stepping in.

I rarely read stories about the really friendly projects that do their best to mentor newcomers.

I'm currently mentoring for the OpenStack project as part of the Gnome Outreach Program for Women. Everyone I see talking to the interns, whether or not they're directly involved with or even aware of OPW, is helpful and makes the time to be friendly and answer questions ; what they see is new contributors interested in helping out and it's in their own interest and the project's to give a hand at the start, when it is most needed.

If you like open-source and sometimes think you'd like to contribute if you could: explore the community for the project(s) you're interested in. Most of them are really nice places to be. Have a look. Ask someone on IRC or on a mailing list for where to find directions on how to get started. Healthy communities are concerned about being welcoming and attracting new blood, because they know they need it to survive and be sustainable.

And if you're still hesitant about jumping in and have a specific question I might be able to help with, get in touch :)

Leave a comment

Playing Last.fm from emacs

I enjoy listening to Last.fm and recently decided it would be handier to control it from within my emacs session. Getting it to work didn't take too long but wasn't as straightforward as I hoped, mostly because it's easier to find documentation for older versions of emms (including on the official website) and the last.fm parts have been entirely rewritten recently. Anyhow! If you're in a rush, the short version is: find the latest version of the code and follow the documentation from the source itself!

What to install

From your package manager, using Debian here:

aptitude install emms mplayer2

Note, that installing mplayer instead worked fine on an Ubuntu machine.

Getting an API key

Search the documentation linked above to get more details. Basically, using the latest version of the Last.fm API requires a secret API key, which isn't a concept that works well with GPL software. To work around this, we request a personal API key, which we will add to our .emacs config file.

Request a key at Last.fm. The keys will be displayed on screen rather than sent to you, therefore write them down now. As far as I can tell the "app description" will only be seen by yourself, when you allow emms-lastfm-client to access your Last.fm account so don't worry too much about the description.

.emacs

Add the following to your config file:

(require 'emms-setup)
(emms-all)
(emms-default-players)
(setq emms-lastfm-client-username "myusername")
(setq emms-lastfm-client-api-key "myapikey")
(setq emms-lastfm-client-api-secret-key "mysecretkey")

Setting up emms-lastfm-client

Now, within emacs (taken straight from the docs!):

  1. M-x emms-lastfm-client-user-authorization - this will open a web page, asking if you want to grant access to the app (with the name and description you gave it when requesting the API key)
  2. M-x emms-lastfm-client-get-session - this is to store the authorisation key so you don't have to go through the authorisation process every time. If it doesn't work you might need to first create ~/.emacs.d/emms manually.

You're set! M-x emms-lastfm-client-play-similar-artists to select who to listen to :)

Useful tips

To stop the music: M-x emms-stop.

To remove the url display/track information:  M-x emms-mode-line-toggle (or -disable) and to remove the playing time information: M-x emms-playing-time-disable-display (they push the org messages too far out right!)

Other error messages

Some messages you may encounter along the way...

Contacting host: ws.audioscrobbler.com:80
progn: missing variables to generate handshake call

The documentation seems to suggest that setting a username is optional, but it's not. Make sure your .emacs contains your username in addition to the API key and secret key.

f: Don't know how to play track: (*track* (type . url) (name . "http://play.last.fm/user/1234567890abcdef0.mp3") (metadata))

emms uses an external program to play music, which is why you need to install mplayer or vlc.

Leave a comment | 4 so far

Balsamiq Mockups, oh, and Pinch too Pinch is a micro-blogging reader for identi.ca on the N900

I like micro-blogging, or well, I hang out on identi.ca anyway. I'd like to use it more but I have trouble keeping track when I add interesting-but-too-prolific people on my subscription list, or I sink when the occasional flamewar/"debate" erupts in a group I follow. I don't write a lot but I read, and I wanted the reading to be more efficient. The way I read identi.ca at the moment is:

  • either through the web page, trying to find back the page where I last read a notice and then coming back slowly to the first page
  • or on XMPP, where if something came up while I was disconnected I can receive a huge heap of messages when coming online even though I may only have a few minutes available to read, and there's no way to mark where I stop if I only read through some of the notices.

Hm... You'd think there's a nice software announcement coming after this but there isn't really. This was the problem I set out to fix a few months ago and here I want to show how I used the wonderful Balsamiq Mockups software to wireframe my interface before jumping into the code (there is code though. You may skip to the end if that's the only thing you care about.)

Balsamiq Mockups

I've been using this for 18 months or so, and I really like it. It enables me to make on screen, in a nice readable way, something I used to scribble on paper before. The end result is something nice to look at that I can work from, and if this is software built for someone else I can show them (without any recoil of horror!) and make sure this is what they have in mind and that I'm not forgetting something glaringly obvious.

Let's go back to the micro-blogging reader. The first thing to handle was the timeline.

Wireframe of a fake timeline with messages and side-notes

The first time you use Balsamiq -- after the first 5 minutes where you will be amazed and clicking eveywhere (try it, they have a web demo on their site!) -- it will take a bit of time to learn where to find what, and what widgets exist. Soon enough though, you'll be making these nice wireframes about as fast as the crappy hand drawings.

You can have several mockups open in different tabs, which is useful when working on a sequence of screens or different parts of the same project.

As hinted at on that first image, Balsamiq provides widgets both for wireframing, as well as for annotations about the wireframe itself.

Wireframe of a single event, with the possible actions (reply, highlight, repeat), the follow-up screens and a post-it note

Here I use fancy arrows, and a post-it note. There are other elements like the curly braces from before or the round yellow numbers, to help call attention to differents part of the design. With the different containers and widgets you can easily mock up desktop, web and mobile apps. The font and general feel of the different elements is this way -- a bit unequal, not perfect -- to remind of hand drawing and avoid giving a slick, "finished" impression. It's still easy to make radical changes at this stage of the development, so that's the kind of discussions it should encourage (also, as opposed to say a realistic HTML mock-up, the customer/user is less likely to ask if it'll be done by next week since it looks nearly ready already!)

The third and last mock-up I made for the project was of the menu:

Nice and simple. Go give Balsamiq's web demo a try, you'll see how intuitive the interface is and then you'll remember it when you need it or wish for something similar. It's worth every penny ($79).

Now, what about Pinch, you ask? Well, the first attempt looked like this:

Initial maemo version

The wireframe was a very helpful guideline in remembering my goals and the big picture, to avoid getting lost in the details over and over again, though of course one should feel free to veer away when needed. On a touchscreen, a button with some text is a lot easier to click than just a small icon for instance. Also, the moving red line turned out to be a pain in the butt to figure out in pygtk so messages are simply greyed out and it's just as readable.

By the way, did anyone notice the glaring feature omission in the mockups? If not, maybe you're more of a spectator, like me...! I found out when attending an interesting talk wanting to share some good tidbit and... oops. There's no way to post a brand new message :) Ah well.

Pinch

The app ended up being named pinch due to... a thesaurus really, never mind. At the moment it's really read-only: you get your messages, you mark them as read or highlight the stuff you want to deal with later. You can remove messages you've read. No replying or writing anything though. I still consider it technically usable by other people as my name isn't hard-coded anymore, thus it's possible to set up the app for yourself ;)

The main reason development stalled is that using the app is dead slow and I'm not sure of the best way to deal with it, and I haven't made the time to research how to handle this on a phone. There's a lot of waiting around looking at nothing while the app needs to grab URLs from identi.ca and parse the XML. There are still a lot of interesting problems to solve (and I still need a nice reader-optimised micro-blogging tool dammit), so I should get back to it eventually.

In the spirit of the Myth of the Genius Programmer talk and other people saying the shame of sharing code goes away after a while, I decided to open up my GitHub repo (or perhaps it is happening because I haven't touched the code since June and forgot how terrible, terrible it is).

Resources or tips on making performance improvements for pygtk and/or Maemo apps would be so very welcome, if anyone has recommendations? :)

Leave a comment | 2 so far

LaTeX workshop in Tog

I'm back for more enabling! (Mwahaha) Seeing there was some interest in LaTeX, the very awesome Triona kindly offered to teach an evening workshop on the topic on September 21st, in Tog. Whether you're interested in starting out with LaTeX, or would like a refresher, join us! The registration information is available on Tog's blog.

- - -

Hello you! Do you know about something cool, relating to open-source or open culture or technology? Would you like to teach a workshop about it? Please get in touch!

Leave a comment

EuroPython 2011: Brian Fitzpatrick on the Myth of the Genius Programmer

Link: talk description and video

A lot of user questions for the Google Code project are along the lines of "how do I hide code until it's ready", "how can I wipe the history and start from scratch" and so on: they are about people's insecurities.

When you have elitism and anonymity, suddenly everyone is elite. There's a whole mythology that gets built around programming heroes (Torvalds, van Rossum, Walls).

There are no genius. The only thing this has created is a fear of showing mistakes. This insecurity inhibits progress, makes the process slower, brings lower quality and a lower bus factor.

Avoiding the trap

  • Lose the ego
  • Criticism is not evil: give and take it politely. You are not your code. People criticising your code are not out to get you.
  • Embrace failure (just don't fail the same thing over and over!)

The speaker shared an interesting story (probably an aphorism?) of an executive that makes a mistake that costs his company 10 million dollars. The day after, he starts packing up his things and when the CEO summons him to his office, he's ready to hand in his resignation, saying there is no need to fire him. The CEO replies "Fire you? Why would I do that? I just spent 10 millions dollars training you!"

  • Iterate quickly
  • Practice is key
  • Be a small fish, as in don't be the smartest person in your company. You'll learn much more and faster
  • Be influenced. "Alpha" programmers think they know everything and won't ever listen -- you may find that you actually gain more influence, by being willing to be influenced!
  • Be vulnerable, repeated vulnerability becomes a strength long term.

Tools

Tools won't solve sociological problems, but they may influence behaviours. Pay attention to the tools, they can influence culture and moral, for instance by encouraging "cave" behaviour where developers work on their own for a long time and dump a big chunk of code: it's bad for collaboration, reviewing, etc.

You don't need to hide a project until it's "ready." Simply don't advertise it. People may find you because they are looking for something like this.

Don't let people collaborate until it's too late: they may help with code reviews, or pointing out to you existing libraries you missed. If it's too late in the project, they have no possibility to drive, to be a strong part of the project and it's less likely they will contribute.

Certainly get a prototype ready, some running code and some design, but let it still be something that you're happy to step back on.

Conclusion

  • Don't try to be a genius
  • Collaborate early and often
  • Pay attention to default behaviours (the ones encouraged by tools especially)
  • Pay attention to timing

...and if you do all this, people will think you're a genius!

Some of the questions/responses

Make sure to write a manifesto with the direction you want for your project from early development, so there are no major clashes or misunderstandings later on when people get involved.

If you don't care about credit, wow will you go places. If someone "steals" your idea and they have more reach (e.g. more clout/connections), it's great! It means it's more likely the idea will be implemented, and you'll have more ideas anyway.

On influencing a new team you just joined with best/better practices: start by doing good work and building up a good reputation, then you get to pay it back on something you believe matters. You have to choose your battles, you can't step in front of every train (resistance to change is like a very fast train! Hard to stop.)

Leave a comment

Getting started developing for Maemo in Python

After a few months of owning a N900 finally came the itch to write an app for it -- using of course Python! The Maemo documentation is excellent, I'm only putting my notes down here for future reference.

First off, making sure to know which version of Maemo is on the phone: Settings -> About: Maemo 5.

Setting up

The documentation at http://maemo.org/development/ is truly excellent. Of interest to us to begin with is installing the SDK. The wiki has been kept up to date with tips and links to solutions of potential problems at the stage where you might encounter them, making any issue a non-event.

Note: It turns out that the SDK is optional to develop with Python. If you would prefer not to set this all up, you can simply move your Python files to the phone or write the code there directly. Personally I found having a full SDK on the laptop to be really handy to try things out quickly, and to tweak and understand what the final result will look like.

Getting started, every time

The SDK docs lists the various commands that may work for your distro and system specifics, which is awesome but can be a bit dense to read through and find again later on. Here's what I do on Debian unstable:

Xephyr :2 -host-cursor -screen 800x480x16 -dpi 96 -ac &

and:

/scratchbox/login
export DISPLAY=:2
af-sb-init.sh start

Important: Don't forget to run `af-sb-init.sh stop` at the end, or say, if you messed your Xephyr command and need to restart it -- you will need to stop this script before attempting to start the emulator environment again. Otherwise there will be D-Bus conflicts and things won't work.

Hello, world

After setting up the SDK, the documentation recommends you go learn about packaging next -- I kept that one for later, it's more interesting to build something first!

By following the documentation you can find the Hello world for Python, which does work on the phone with no hassle and without stopping by the SDK: Developer Guide -> Programming Environments -> PyMaemo quick start.

If you'd like to work in scratchbox (quicker turnaround!), you can go back to the Maemo SDK on your machine and follow again the instructions to set up a Python development environment.

Hello world, again

The same Python-related packages need to be installed into the dev environment, within scratchbox.

nano /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/ fremantle free non-free
apt-get update
apt-get install maemo-python-env (and qemacs :o))

Note that on the phone, you would install maemo-python-device-env (cf. Quick Start Guide), while when working in scratchbox  you should install maemo-python-env instead (cf.  Python support)

qemacs -nw hello.py
python2.5 hello.py

Make sure you're calling `python2.5` explicitly or the program will fail with "ImportError: No module named gtk". While working with Hildon I use this command instead, which you'll learn when doing the UI Tutorial.

run-standalone.sh python2.5 hello.py

Because of the various warnings messing up my scratchbox screen, I ended up using emacs from outside of scratchbox. The files you're working with are located at /scratchbox/users/<username>/home/<username>.

Once you can run the Hello world program, the next step is to go through the handy UI tutorial, which teaches a lot about Hildon and GTK.

I would also recommend installing the devhelp packages for:

  • PyGTK (python-gtk2-doc),
  • the PyGTK tutorial (python-gtk2-tutorial), and
  • the hildon API (libhildon-1-doc) (also available online). The API reference is in C but after doing the tutorial it's easy enough to guess the Python names. Note that although it's still handy, the Debian package does not appear to be the very latest version, e.g. HildonSizeType isn't documented.

I'm really happy with that setup, and it's lovely to get a nice looking UI working so quickly and easily. This is reconciling me with GUI programming -- it looks nice and because of the small screen, there isn't a ton of repetitive boilerplate to write. I can't wait to be far along enough in that project, that I have an excuse to learn again about Debian packaging! :-)

Screenshot of development environment

Leave a comment

Dexy Documentation Workshop in Tog

I'm facilitating-slash-attending a day-long workshop on Dexy in Tog next Saturday, March 26th. Dexy is an open-source tool for code documentation. The workshop will be presented and led by Dexy creator Ana Nelson and promises to be both interesting and a ton of fun :-) Ana plans to make it very hands-on, an open-source project will be selected beforehand so that the documentation we create is useful and meaningful. I'm really looking forward to it!

You can learn more about this...

...on Tog's related blog post

...and on the event sign-up page.

The event is free and everybody is welcome! Please sign up beforehand though, as places are limited.

And on a related note, if you're around Dublin and an open-source contributor, and would like to prepare that kind of event for your project, please chat with me. I would love to have more of these workshops in Tog!

Leave a comment | 2 so far